I have always felt that the eyes are the most betraying fact about a person’s character armour, woman or man… windows of the soul indeed. Eyes express so much in a flash of an instant…Yet, there is always that beautiful moment when the woman after losing herself in the gaze of the other, “reels back” and realises what she is doing…matter sets in. In other words, spirit/desire is checked back by the habitual prudent material self, the utilitarian self of morality and inhibition….
Prigogine on Deleuze : I read several of his works and found them quite
interesting, but quite frankly there was quite a bit that I did not
understand. In my opinion, there is little to be gained from trying to
rethink metaphysical concepts like Bergson's "duree." Science today has
surpassed Newton and Einstein and reached a level where we can think of
the problems of time and creation in more flexible, if still analytical,
ways. For me this is the more interesting route.
Prigogine on Deleuze : I read several of his works and found them quite
interesting, but quite frankly there was quite a bit that I did not
understand. In my opinion, there is little to be gained from trying to
rethink metaphysical concepts like Bergson's "duree." Science today has
surpassed Newton and Einstein and reached a level where we can think of
the problems of time and creation in more flexible, if still analytical,
ways. For me this is the more interesting route.
Likelife [science it has struggled against the vital expression no doubt because after the instant of the book of Job where the Deleuzian arrival from in between science-fiction and cyber-units
I wonder what will happen nexts probably (and I say probably one never knows) more intesive or “punish” me for their “misspelled conductive towards the one never knows with women…even Freud gave up on trying to understand them - the famous “what does woman want”...
